Licensed throughout the United States, Israel, and U.S. International Military Courts

En Español | Make a Payment
Feldmann Nagel Cantafio PLLC
  • Our Team
    • Ralph Cantafio
    • Charles Feldmann
    • David Nagel
    • Ret. Colonel John J. Canham, Jr.
    • Abe Erdynast
    • David Feeder
    • K. John Tannous
    • Matthew S. Finberg
    • Mark Fischer
    • Ret. Colonel Steven A. Folsom
    • Jered Harris
    • Jennifer Hayden
    • Franklin E. Hopkins
    • Caroline Kert
    • Dave Kleiber
    • Lilly Lentz
    • Benoit M. Letendre
    • David E. Little
    • Ken Martin
    • Patrick Moran
    • Steven Pacitti
    • Walker Pritchard
    • Sara Ross
    • Gregory Thomas
    • Stefan Feuerherdt
    • Morgan Paterson
    • Mike Lazar
    • Amber Naiman
    • Deanna Sinclair
    • John Seckman
  • Who We Are
  • What We Do
    • Administrative & Regulatory Law and Lobbying
    • Arts & Entertainment Law
    • Bankruptcy Law
    • Business & Commercial Law
    • Cannabis Law
    • Civil Litigation
    • Construction Law
    • Criminal Defense
    • Divorce
    • DUI Defense
    • Education Law
    • Employment Law
    • Energy Mediation and Arbitration
    • Environmental Law
    • Estate Planning and Probate
    • Family Law
    • HOA Law
    • Hunting Fishing & Wildlife Violations
    • Intellectual Property
    • Military Criminal Defense
    • Oil and Gas Law
    • Personal Injury
    • Real Estate
    • Water Law
    • Workers' Compensation
    • For Attorneys/Out Of State Counsel
  • Blog
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • Make a Payment
(888) 458-0991
    • Our Team
      • Ralph Cantafio
      • Charles Feldmann
      • David Nagel
      • Ret. Colonel John J. Canham, Jr.
      • Abe Erdynast
      • David Feeder
      • K. John Tannous
      • Matthew S. Finberg
      • Mark Fischer
      • Ret. Colonel Steven A. Folsom
      • Jered Harris
      • Jennifer Hayden
      • Franklin E. Hopkins
      • Caroline Kert
      • Dave Kleiber
      • Lilly Lentz
      • Benoit M. Letendre
      • David E. Little
      • Ken Martin
      • Patrick Moran
      • Steven Pacitti
      • Walker Pritchard
      • Sara Ross
      • Gregory Thomas
      • Stefan Feuerherdt
      • Morgan Paterson
      • Mike Lazar
      • Amber Naiman
      • Deanna Sinclair
      • John Seckman
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
      • Administrative & Regulatory Law and Lobbying
      • Arts & Entertainment Law
      • Bankruptcy Law
      • Business & Commercial Law
        • Purchases and Sales of Businesses
        • Private Placements
        • Corporate Transactions
        • Choice of Entity
        • 501(C)(3)'s and Non-Profits
        • Commercial Litigation
        • Liquor Licensing
      • Cannabis Law
      • Civil Litigation
      • Construction Law
        • Mechanic’s Liens
        • Land Use Regulation
        • Development and Subdivision Planning
        • Homeowners’ Associations
      • Criminal Defense
      • Divorce
      • DUI Defense
      • Education Law
      • Employment Law
      • Energy Mediation and Arbitration
      • Environmental Law
      • Estate Planning and Probate
        • Common Law Marriage and Probate
        • Court Approval for Settlements
        • Estate Planning Mediation
        • Fiduciaries
        • Guardianships and Conservatorships
        • Wills
      • Family Law
      • HOA Law
      • Hunting Fishing & Wildlife Violations
      • Intellectual Property
        • Copyrights
        • Patents
        • Trademarks
        • Trade Secrets
      • Military Criminal Defense
      • Oil and Gas Law
      • Personal Injury
        • What To Do After a Car Accident
        • Why Hire a Personal Injury Attorney
        • Car Accidents
      • Real Estate
        • Foreclosure
      • Water Law
      • Workers' Compensation
      • For Attorneys/Out Of State Counsel
    • Blog
    • Testimonials
    • Contact Us
      • Careers
    • Make a Payment
  • Search
  • Contact
  • Team
Blog /2018 /March /Laches Defense
Share This Post:

Laches Defense

Mar 30, 2018 /
Family Law Division of FNC
  • Child Support /
  • Divorce /

Laches is an equitable remedy that prevents a plaintiff (the one who initiates a legal action) from obtaining relief where he or she waited too long to file suit against the defendant. It is similar to the statute of limitations, which prevents a plaintiff from suing after a certain period of time (e.g., 2 years), except that there is no clear definition of what constitutes laches or how long is too long. The three elements of laches are (1) full knowledge of the facts by the party against whom the defense is asserted, (2) unreasonable delay in pursuing an available remedy, and (3) intervening reliance by and prejudice to the party asserting the defense. Hickerson v. Vessels, 316 P.3d 620 (Colo. 2014).

Laches is rarely raised in family law cases. Since at least 1960, Colorado courts have consistently held that the doctrine of laches does NOT apply in actions for the recovery of past due child support. See, e.g., Hauck v. Shuck, 353 P.2d 79, 81 (Colo. 1960). However, in 2016, the Colorado Supreme Court decided, in In re Marriage of Johnson, 380 P.3d 150 (Colo. 2016), that a petitioner MAY raise laches as an affirmative defense in an action to collect interest on unpaid child support.

In Johnson, the husband/father was ordered to pay $400 in monthly child support for his two children until they reached the age of emancipation. At the time of the divorce, the age for emancipation in Colorado was 21. However, in 1991, the Colorado legislature changed the age from 21 to 19. The husband, who at the time was unaware of the correct age of majority in Colorado, discontinued paying child support in 1994 when the youngest child turned 18, assuming that his child support obligation had ended.

In 2012, the wife/mother brought an action against her ex-husband in trial court, claiming he owed her $893,285 in back payments plus interest for years of unpaid child support. The husband objected that he should not be responsible for paying interest because the wife waited 18 years to initiate her claim. However, since the age of majority changed in 1991, the husband agreed that he was responsible for $4,800 for the one year of child support that he did not pay after their youngest child turned 18. The Court held that laches was an available remedy and remanded the case to the trial court to determine whether the husband could prove the necessary elements.

Consequently, if you are trying to collect unpaid child support plus interest, it is important to act on your rights as soon as possible. Otherwise, you may lose the right to collect what you are legally entitled to.

Please contact the Domestic Team at Feldmann Nagel Cantafio PLLC for all of your family law needs.

Previous Next

Discuss Your Case For Free

Our legal team is dedicated to guiding clients through their legal journeys and towards the outcomes they need.

  • Please enter your name.
  • This isn't a valid email address.
    Please enter your email.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
    Please enter your phone number.
    You entered an invalid number.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.

Recent Posts

  • Understanding Termination of Parental Rights
  • Living with Internal Revenue Code Section 280E
  • What is a Prenuptial Agreement and Who Should Have One?

Most Popular

  • Jeremy People's Case - Termination of Parental Rights
  • Colorado Divorce Mediation: What, Who, When and Why
  • Grandparent Custody and Visitation in Colorado

Categories

  • Addiction (2)
  • Adoption (3)
  • Allocation of Parental Responsibility (7)
  • Cannabis (4)
  • Cannabis Business (2)
  • CBD (2)
  • Checkpoints (1)
  • Child Custody (30)
  • Child Support (10)
  • Civil Litigation (2)
  • Civil Unions (3)
  • Constitutional Law (3)
  • Corporate (5)
  • Criminal Defense (49)
  • Divorce (82)
  • Domestic Partnership (4)
  • Domestic Relations (2)
  • Domestic Violence (9)
  • Estate Planning (3)
  • Family Law (79)
  • Federal Law (1)
  • Financial Disclosures (5)
  • Firm News (24)
  • Gay Rights Movement (3)
  • Immigration (2)
  • In the News (7)
  • License Suspension (1)
  • Marijuana (23)
  • Marijuana Business (4)
  • Mediation (4)
  • Military Law (1)
  • Modification (1)
  • Oil & Gas (4)
  • Parental Alienation (2)
  • Parental Rights (14)
  • Parenting (24)
  • Parenting Plan (12)
  • Paternity (3)
  • Personal Injury (1)
  • Prenuptial Agreements (2)
  • Privacy Concerns (1)
  • Property Division (2)
  • Prostitution (1)
  • Relocation (2)
  • Restraining Orders (2)
  • Same Sex Marriage (5)
  • Sex Crimes (2)
  • Spousal Maintenance (5)
  • Supervised Timesharing (1)
  • Tax Law (1)
  • Termination of Parental Rights (2)
  • Visitation (7)
  • Wills & Trusts (1)
  • Worker's Compensation (1)

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn

Discuss Your Case For Free
(888) 458-0991

Our legal team is dedicated to guiding clients through their legal journeys and towards the outcomes they need.

  • Please enter your name.
  • This isn't a valid email address.
    Please enter your email.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
    Please enter your phone number.
    Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.

Contact Us

Feldmann Nagel Cantafio PLLC
Colorado Lawyer

1875 Lawrence St , Suite 730
Denver, CO 80202
View Map

contact@feldmann-nagel.com

Call Today

(888) 458-0991

Local (303) 292-4567
https://www.colo-lawyers.com/
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
© All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Scorpion
x

⚠

Your browser is out of date. To get the full experience of this website, please update to most recent version.

Update My Browser